Army to Invest $7 Billion in Renewable-Energy Projects

By J.D. Leipold

The Army plans to invest more than $7 billion in renewable-energy sources, wind, solar, biomass and geothermal, and has released a draft request for proposal, or RFP, that could allow multiple projects to begin nationwide.

Speaking at a media roundtable March 15, Katherine Hammack, assistant secretary of the Army for Installations, Energy & Environment, said the cumulative investment will help the Army reach its goal of having 25 percent of the Army’s energy come from renewable sources by 2025. She began the roundtable by restating the Army’s “net-zero strategy.”

“Specifically, a net-zero energy installation produces as much energy annually as it uses, and this does not mean replacement of current energy requirements with onsite energy production,” she said. “It means that installations address energy efficiency as the primary first step and then evaluate, repurpose and reuse energy as well as energy recovery.”

Presently, the Army consumes 2.5 million megawatt hours annually.

In addition to energy conservation, installations will strive to establish alternative forms of energy that will allow them to “island” or continue to operate should the power grid fail.

“We understand there’s a need to enhance our energy security because it’s operationally necessary, financially prudent and critical to our mission,” Hammack said. “We know that power grids are increasingly vulnerable and expose Army operations to risk.”

She noted those risks include terrorist attacks as well as natural disasters such as drought and forest-fire conditions in the west (which some installations are already facing) and unstable weather to include tornadoes.

Hammack said the Army’s risk-mitigation strategy involves onsite renewable-energy production and it must be done in a fiscally responsible manner, which is where the Energy Initiatives Task Force, or EITF, comes into play.

The EITF serves as the central managing office to plan and execute large-scale renewable energy projects of greater than 10 megawatts (roughly enough to power 30,000 homes) on Army installations, which will be accomplished by leveraging private-sector financing.

“The EITF was tasked to develop a process that is clear, consistent and transparent so that we can provide the private sector with a consistent environment to engage with the Army which will allow EITF projects to maximize return on investments for both the Army and industry,” Hammack said.

EITF Executive Director John Lushetsky said that since the EITF began operating six months ago, it has developed standard approaches and criteria to evaluate different project opportunities to make the business of large-scale, renewable-energy development much more predictable and routine.

“We have screened more than 180 Army and National Guard installations and are currently engaged with 15 different installations at various levels of due diligence,” he said. “For each of these projects, the EITF reviews a number of critical project success factors that include installation security and mission impacts, expected life-cycle economics, real-estate access, utility regulations, systems integration, environmental permitting and acquisition approach.”

A renewable-energy project guide will be issued for comment later in the spring Lushetsky said.

The task force has been working closely with the U.S. Corps of Engineers to develop a request for proposal under what it calls the Multiple Award Order Contract, or MATOC. The MATOC provides a two-step process. In the first step, companies submit initial proposals and qualifications that are not project-specific.

“This will allow us to select who we think are broadly qualified companies to bid on solar, wind, biomass — waste to energy — as well as geothermal projects,” Hammack said. “Once we’ve established that qualified list, then we’ll be in a position as projects are qualified by the EITF to issue task orders.”

The draft RFP for the MATOC is out for public comment until March 24. Lushetsky said in the last six months the EITF has had requests to meet with some 195 companies and financial institutions, and met with 40 to outline the EITF approach and plans.

The EITF plans to have a summit in May to meet with industry and discuss the renewable- energy development guide as well as specific projects.

“Long term, the Army is also interested in exploring the role of micro grids and energy storage as those technologies become better defined and more affordable,” Lushetsky said.

Army Attacks Hardware Corrosion

Corrosion engineer Nancy Whitmire goes over the findings of a corrosion test with Steve Carr, the program manager for the Aviation and Missile Command's Corrosion Program. The test involved coating metal coupons with different finishes and then placing them in an accelerated corrosion chamber to determine the amount of corrosion that would develop in a sand and salt environment.

REDSTONE ARSENAL, Ala. — Scott Reis is on a mission.

An anti-corrosion mission, that is.

He and fellow Aviation and Missile Research Development and Engineering Center employees carry out the mission of the Aviation and Missile Command’s Corrosion Program Office to promote corrosion prevention programs for a wide range of AMCOM systems. They study the way metals, coatings and finishes develop corrosion; engineer design and materials solutions for corrosion issues in the field; train Soldiers on how to prevent equipment corrosion; and tout the ill effects of corrosion on the Army’s missile and aviation systems.

Those ill effects are staggering in terms of capabilities lost, and the cost of repairing or replacing equipment due to corrosion. At AMCOM, an estimated $1.6 billion a year is spent combating corrosion issues. The U.S. General Accounting Office estimated the cost of corrosion to the Department of Defense at between $9 billion and $20 billion annually.

“Problems with corrosion represent 20 percent of AMCOM’s total annual maintenance program,” Steve Carr, AMCOM’s corrosion program manager, said.

(more…)

500 Units of Blood To Save One Soldier’s Life

by 1st Lt. Anthony M. Formica, 1st Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division Public Affairs  

PANJWA’I DISTRICT, Afghanistan – On the evening of Nov. 12, Sgt. Adam Lundy found himself in the ROLE 3 hospital at Kandahar Airfield. Just two hours prior, Lundy, an Alliance, Neb., native, was on patrol in the western side of Panjwa’i district, when his platoon struck several IEDs.

First Lt. Nicholas Vogt, platoon leader with the 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry Regiment, 1st Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division, stands next to a village elder during a mission in Kandahar province, Afghanistan. (Courtesy Photo)

First Lt. Nicholas Vogt, platoon leader with the 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry Regiment, 1st Stryker Brigade Combat Team, 25th Infantry Division, stands next to a village elder during a mission in Kandahar province, Afghanistan. (Courtesy Photo)

Suffering multiple shrapnel wounds, he was MEDEVACed to Role 3 medical facility for further assessment. In spite of having received shrapnel wounds to his face, arms and torso, he was listed in good condition and was able to walk unassisted.

Two of his comrades, 1st Lt. Nicholas Vogt and Spc. Calvin Pereda, were not as fortunate. Pereda, the platoon’s radio-telephone operator, had been in the immediate vicinity of the blast area of the first IED and suffered massive internal bleeding, which ultimately cost him his life.

For Pereda, it was the second time in his seven months in Afghanistan that he had been injured in combat.

Vogt, a 2010 graduate of West Point, had barely been in charge of his platoon for a month when he had heroically pushed one of his soldiers out of the way of a second IED and absorbed the brunt of the blast.

The force of the blast combined with the projectiles seriously injured the Ohio native.

As a result, Vogt was listed in critical condition and was under constant observation at the Intensive Care Unit, requiring a double-amputation and massive amounts of blood to stay alive.

Lundy, a combat veteran of both Iraq and Afghanistan, recalls being overcome with emotion at learning about the condition of both of his comrades.

“I couldn’t think,” Lundy said, remembering that day. “I needed to cool off, clear my head.” Lundy recalls not being able to formulate cogent emotions, let alone thoughts.

“I was just feeling so many things, anger, fear, guilt, confusion … all of it,” he said.

(more…)

Webinar Focuses on Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, Natural Disasters

An onlooker surveys results after a natural disaster strikes. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman 1st Class Jette Carr)

Defense Centers of Excellence for Psychological Health and Traumatic Brain Injury (DCoE) will host its latest webinar, “Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and Natural Disasters,” Aug. 25, 2011, from 1 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. (EST).

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) not only affects service members who experience traumatic events while deployed, it can also affect civilian communities, particularly in the aftermath of natural disasters like Hurricane Katrina, the earthquakes in Haiti and Japan, and the tornadoes that tore through the southern United States.

(more…)

Real PTSD Education from a Virtual World

By Dr. Greg Reger

Shortly after returning from deployment to Afghanistan, Sgt. Jackson finds himself at a local mall, struggling with his emotions. Images from a suicide bombing he witnessed fill his mind as he walks. Stopping at a restaurant, he’s on edge – can’t relax – his eyes constantly sweeping the area for a threat that will never materialize. Exhausted, he enters a mattress store. As he tries out a bed for his room at home, he falls asleep. There in the middle of the showroom, he re-lives the bombing in a vivid nightmare, waking in cold a sweat.

Future Force: Army Research Lab Equips Warfighters

Scientists at the Army Research Laboratory conduct research on a variety of fronts. Here, a mannequin is positioned in one of the lab's auditory research environments. ARL personnel conduct an array of auditory research, including the effects of various types of headgear on sound detection and the identification and localization of acoustic signatures. Photo Credit: Army Research Lab

 


A researcher monitors a Soldier as he uses a multi-display driving simulator. The simulator is used in a variety of research applications, to include mild traumatic brain injury treatment. Photo Credit: Doug LaFon

 

The U.S. Army is a well-trained, well-equipped fighting force. And behind every weapon, piece of armor and training that prepares and protects Soldiers in battle are teams of scientists and engineers who are solving complex problems and driving future capabilities.

As part of the U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command, the Army Research Laboratory is a key component of the Army science, technology and engineering enterprise that supports Soldiers, according to ARL Director John Miller.

“Our diverse assortment of unique facilities and dedicated workforce of government and private sector partners make up the largest source of state-of-the-art research and analysis in the Army,” said Miller.

Focusing on the future while supporting the current warfighters, ARL’s scientists are a diverse group who hold the keys to technologies for Soldiers five, 10 and even 20 years down the road.

Almost every non-medical scientific field is touched by ARL, from advanced sensors to neuroscience to flexible electronics to weapons technologies to complex analysis. Basically everything a Soldier needs or may need in the future is investigated by ARL.

Although it has more than 2,000 employees, the majority of whom are highly-educated and skilled leaders in their fields, the lab combines in-house technical expertise with the intellectual powerhouse of academic and industry partners.

The research discoveries ARL produces either within its laboratories or through its partners are used as the foundations for other Army research, development and engineering centers under RDECOM, Miller explained.

“We act as the corporate laboratory, providing the underpinning of science, technology and analysis for the rest of the Army,” said Miller.

(more…)

DTIC: The Series Wrap-Up

 

Did you catch  our 22-part series produced by the Defense Technical Information Center? Over several months, DTIC provided weekly entries detailing their various research and information centers, explaining how each plays a role in our nation’s defense. Check out the links below to learn more.

1) The Secret is Out: Now Do You Want to Be Friends?

2) Fixing a Rusty Economy Using Technology

3) In Defense of Decontamination: How to Clean Up After a Biological Incident

4) Face-to-Face with Real-Life Explosives Hero: Decorated Warfighter Awes Propulsion Community

5) If You’re Worried About Computer Security, You Should Know…

6) No Really … Saving Money Using Advanced Technology

7) This Ain’t No Rodeo Robots on a Mission

8) Keeping America’s Top Fighter Pilots Flying High

9) Coming Soon to an App Store Near You: Mobile Technology for Information Collection and Dissemination

10) Guesstimates, Fuzzy Logic and Believe it or Not…Better Decision Making

11) UAVs: Not So Expendable Anymore

12) From Garbage to Gas: Today’s Military Goes Green

13) Unlocking Research on Nuclear and Radiological Threats

14) It Doesn’t Take a Rocket Scientist

15) From Shoes to Software, Benchmarking Helps Organizations Find the “Right Fit”

16) The Evolution of Information Protection

17) So, Why Do You Change Your Oil Every 3,000 Miles

18) One Year Later: DoD Develops Oil Detection Technology

19) Modeling Human Interface

20) Peering Through the Sniper’s Scope

21) Forget CSI, When it Comes to Downed Aircraft, Call SURVIAC

22) Information Analysis Centers, Saving Money and Saving Lives

 

Sign up for Armed with Science email alerts!


Information Analysis Centers, Saving Money and Saving Lives

Six-Month Blogging Campaign Increases “Friends” and Shares Stories of Success

By Christopher Zember, Deputy Director, Information Analysis Centers

This blog was shared by the Information Analysis Center (IAC) Program Management Office (PMO).  It is the final blog in our 22-part series produced by the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).

Six months ago, we started our very first blogging campaign.  Our goal was to reach out and connect with as many people as possible.  By connecting with others in the Armed with Science community, we had the opportunity to share some of our success stories and highlight the mission-critical, warfighter-centric work performed every day by the Information Analysis Centers (IACs).  The past twenty blogs gave our readers a snapshot of some of the incredible work performed by the IACs.  We focused on “hot topics” within the Department including: Oil Detection Sensors, Aircraft Survivability in Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom, MRAP Reliability, Weapons Systems, Information Assurance and so much more. But it doesn’t end there…

(more…)

Page 1 of 3123»

AWS Twitter Feed

Facebook