Securing the Homeland through EPA and DoD Scientific Collaboration

Based on EPA research, a Danbury, CT building being fumigated with Chlorine dioxide following an Anthrax incident. Photo: EPA.

Based on EPA research, a Danbury, CT, building being fumigated with Chlorine dioxide following an Anthrax incident. Photo: EPA.

By Dr. Peter Jutro
US Environmental Protection Agency

As a young child in New York City, I was fascinated by how a huge city worked and could remain livable. My parents told me that when I was first told to clean my room, my snippy response was, “who cleans the outside?” I remember asking where the garbage went, and being told “they take it away.” Apparently a literal kid, I then asked where “away” was.

Well, after 9/11/2001, I was offered the opportunity to revisit these same questions when the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) was tasked with helping the City of New York clean-up after the attack on the World Trade Center. Soon after, EPA was called upon to help decontaminate several public buildings that had been contaminated with Anthrax.

EPA has 30+ years of experience in cleaning up the environment. Such clean-up activities have been supported by research and development. However, homeland security threats have identified additional challenges and research gaps needed to efficiently clean up environments contaminated following a chemical, biological, or radiological (CBR) incident.

Following the events of 2001 and the threats identified association with an intentional or accidental CBR contamination, several new laws and government-wide Homeland Security Presidential Directives were enacted. EPA’s National Homeland Security Research Center was established to undertake the research and provide the scientific information, tools, and support that first responders, practitioners, and policy makers need in order to recover following an attack and to protect our Nation’s drinking water.

Given EPA and the Defense Department’s (DoD) respective missions, our research agendas are similar. However, the use of such information is for different outcomes. The military population is comprised of young, strong, healthy, people selected for stressful duty; they must conduct their mission even in Mission Oriented Protective Posture gear. Also, the military understands that casualties are part of warfare and accepts a level of risk.

On the civilian side, EPA works with other federal agencies including DoD, to protect human health and the environment. We’re part of a team whose mission is more focused on preventing deaths, relieving suffering, recovering from disasters, and ensuring long-term sustainability of ecosystems and the economy. The public demands that we protect all populations, especially those who may be vulnerable and/or risk adverse. Ensuring the public understands the risks is a key component of our work.

EPA benefits from DoD research in many ways. We learn from scientists who once worked on weapons programs. We work collaboratively on ultra-dilute chemical warfare agents for our reference samples, and we develop new protocols and technologies for identifying biological agents. EPA is working with the Defense Threat Reduction Agency on sporicides for cleaning up Anthrax. These are just a few examples of the way that EPA and DoD collaborate on research and development to help protect the nation.

jutroArmedwithScienceAbout the Author: Dr. Peter Jutro is the Deputy Director for Science and Policy at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s National Homeland Security Research Center, headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. Dr. Jutro is stationed in Washington, D.C. EPA and DoD work collaboratively on research and technologies that protect drinking water and advance the state of the art in decontaminating buildings and outdoor areas after a chemical, biological or radiological attack.

This entry was posted in Earth Sciences, Physical Sciences and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.
  • Michael Antoniewicz II

    Considering what the EPA pulled at Ground Zero … I’d take this with a grain of salt the size of the NYC World Trade Center complex as it existed on 2001/09/10.

    The CG had set up the first mobile Incident Command Post on the night of 9/11 and began to monitor the air quality of the area but within days they had to hand over responsibility for hazardous-materials-related issues from the CG Captain of the Port to the EPA. Then the then EPA Administrator, Christine Todd Whitman, went “…on TV assuring the public that the air quality in lower Manhattan was fine (a declaration encouraged by the White House”, even as he Coast Guard Strike Team was monitoring a witches’ brew of airborne toxins and dangerous elements at Ground Zero including asbestos, PCB’s, compressed gases, chlorinated compounds, hydrogen cyanide, mercury, lead, blood, and human remains that they occasionally stumbled over. … Years later, thousands of people, including firemen, police officers, and rescue and recovery workers, are still suffering and dying from respiratory illnesses associated with exposure to hazardous materials generated by the 9/11 attacks that the government failed to address at the time….”

    See David Helvarg’s ‘Rescue Warriors: The U.S. Coast, America’s Forgotten Heroes’ page 83 of the hardback edition.

  • http://www.osha10and30.com/EPA-RRP/training/index.html EPA RRP training

    The collaboration of federal agencies allows for clearer rules for all people, instead of three standards (DOT, EPA, and a state standard).